Skip to main content

​
Key Metrics Dashboard

% Interviews Audited

Displays the proportion of total interviews that have undergone automated or manual bias auditing.

Flag Rate

Indicates the percentage of interviews that have triggered one or more bias-related alerts.

Actions Closed

Shows the number of bias-related cases that have been reviewed and resolved.

​
Adverse-Impact Matrix (AIM)

Adverse-Impact Matrix Evaluates fairness across recruitment stages by comparing selection outcomes between demographic groups.

​
Controls

  • Weighted: Toggle to apply weighted calculations based on group size.
  • Show n: Toggle to display sample sizes for each group.
  • Suppress <N: Input setting to hide values with insufficient sample sizes.

​
Legend Description

Explains the meaning of matrix color indicators that represent fairness thresholds for comparing demographic groups.

​
Parity & Drift Timeline

Parity & Drift Timeline A line chart that visualizes fairness trends over time, tracking changes in parity and potential scoring drift.

​
Controls

  • Metric Dropdown: Selects the fairness metric to display.
  • Time Period Dropdown: Defines whether the chart displays daily, weekly, or monthly intervals.
  • Date Range Selector: Allows viewing trends within a specific time window.
  • Reference Lines: Indicates target fairness levels and watch thresholds.

​
Interviews (Audit/Investigation) Table

Interviews Audit Table A review table listing interviews that triggered bias checks, with expandable details for deeper investigation.

​
Table Controls

  • Export Button: Allows downloading audit data.
  • Search Bar: Search interviews by ID, role, or flags.
  • Filter Button: Apply advanced filtering options.
  • Identifier assigned to the interview under review.
  • Specifies the job role and recruitment stage where the interview took place.
  • Displays the outcome of the interview and the evaluation score assigned.
  • Shows the bias risk level detected for this interview.
  • Lists the bias-related alerts triggered during the evaluation.
  • Detailed narrative explaining why the interview was flagged, displayed when expanded.
  • Indicates whether demographic attributes were considered during the audit.
  • Shows which model version and evaluation rubric were used.
  • Displays reviewer information and available action buttons such as assignment or re-interview.
  • Indicates when the interview was evaluated or flagged.